Texas Honors Boston Strangler—wait, what?

Quite a few websites ascribe ridiculous laws in Houston, Texas that do not exist at all. However, it is true that at one point, legislators in Texas considered giving honor to Albert de Salvo, more commonly known as the Boston Strangler. The Texas House of Representatives passed a resolution sponsored by Waco Rep. Tom Moore, Jr. in 1971 that aimed to commend de Salvo for his “activities and unconventional techniques involving population control and applied psychology.”

The Boston Strangler murdered thirteen single women living in Boston between June 14, 1962, and January 4, 1964. They had been sexually assaulted in their own homes before being strangled with their own clothing. They were anywhere between the ages of 19 and 85.

Criminal investigators were doing their best to find the perpetrator but it was slow going. It was not until Albert de Salvo, charged in the fall of 1964 with the rape of several women in different areas of Massachusetts and known as the “Green Man” or the “Measuring Man,” confessed to the crimes that there was a break in the case. There were inconsistencies in his confession, however, so to this day there are doubts about whether he was the Boston Strangler or not. He probably figured in for a penny, in for a pound. At any rate, he was definitely guilty of the rapes.

None of this explains why Moore would sponsor a bill to honor him, until you remember that even politicians have a sense of humor. He knew that his co-representatives regularly passed resolutions without giving them a good once-over, and he sponsored the resolution as a prank. When it passed unanimously, Moore pulled the plug on the joke, explaining what he had done. He thus earned a place in Texas legislative history and the ire of his fellow representatives. Luckily, Houston and the rest of Texas don’t in truth appreciate or celebrate these kinds of crimes.


The Importance of Reliable Witness Testimony

In car accidents, it is important to establish fault and negligence in order to have legal right for an injury or insurance claim. One thing that can help validate a claim after a car accident is testimonies that witnesses can provide. These testimonies can help provide support for the claim as well as provide insight on how the accident occurred. There are many ways a witness’ testimony can help a plaintiff, and here are some of them:

  • In an event of a car accident, witness testimonies can provide support for the plaintiff’s claims of innocence. In states where the plaintiff’s compensation award may be lowered or forfeited, if it was proved that they have contributed to the accident, witness testimonies can prove the innocence of the plaintiff and validate their claim.
  • Witness testimonies can provide the claims of injury that the plaintiff presents in court. Through the information given by the witnesses, the judge or jury can determine if the injuries that the plaintiff reports is due to the accident or not. Furthermore, they may validate the extent of the injury and through the actions and attitude of the plaintiff following the accident.
  • In the event that the plaintiff has contributed to the accident or was actually the one who caused the accident, then witnesses can verify how the accident occurred and how much fault the plaintiff contributed. Witnesses recounting the accident can verify whether the plaintiff may have contributed or is at-fault for the accident.
  • Just as with discrediting an injured party’s claim of innocence, witness testimonies can also discredit claims of injury. Witness can verify the claimant’s truthfulness regarding their injuries, whether it is really caused by the accident, or if the injury is really severe or not.

It is important to take into consideration the witness’ trustworthiness and demeanor, since it can greatly affect the outcome of the case.


Finding A Lawyer You Can Afford – Tips To Consider

Picking a reliable lawyer is important for obvious reasons. Someone that knows the law backwards and forwards will be able to help you when you need it the most. Read this article for tips on how to choose the right lawyer for you, despite the reason you may need one.

Speak with lawyers that you’re thinking of hiring to get their fee list. Legal representation can vary greatly in pricing; therefore, you should be cognizant of the fees charged before hiring a specific attorney. Nothing is worse than losing a lawyer in the middle of your case.

Find out all that you can about lawyers that you are interested in. What sorts of legal organizations do they belong to, for example? Bar organizations often help to keep their members informed of the very latest in legal news. You want a lawyer who stays abreast of current legal trends!

Do not hire a lawyer without doing some background research. Look their name up on the internet and talk to friends or relatives who might know the lawyer you are interested in.

Look for reviews on local lawyers online. Finding a lawyer that you can trust and respect can be very difficult, so any advice that you can get can be very helpful. Make sure the reviews you consider are on an independent site and take all comments with a grain of salt. The goal is to find the general consensus.

If you do not pick a lawyer that gives you the best advice, you might not end up with the best outcome after a court date. Whether you need a divorce lawyer or a strong defense, this is important. The tips in this article should make it clear how to choose the right lawyer for you.


Don’t Be Afraid to Litigate

For most people, the process of law and justice can be a bit confusing. This is one of the reasons why people try to avoid lawsuits, even when they have a good chance to win in court – because they believe the process is too difficult and complicated. This is not the case, however, and it shouldn’t be. Knowing the terms that are used in court is one way to help in understanding how the system works. One of the most common court proceedings is litigation. Litigation is simply the legal process of taking a case or lawsuit in court, heard and decided by either the judge or jury. It is a very common process when it comes to civil cases. Litigation occurs when the person who filed the lawsuit (called the plaintiff) has reached out and tried to settle the issue with the person who caused the declared injury (called the defendant) but have not succeeded. It may be a hard decision to go to court, mainly because it is lengthy and could cost money. It is, however, the best option to choose after negotiations or settlements have not been agreed upon. Some of the main advantages of litigation are:

  1. It is an open, transparent process.
  2. It follows a strict and uniform law of the land.
  3. The result is final and binding (however, it may still be subject to appeal in higher court)

Hiring a lawyer for litigation is highly advised because they can better represent you and your cause in court therefore increasing your chances of getting the result you prefer. To employ a lawyer is highly vital when it comes to accident cases because they can protect you from being taken advantage of by the defendant’s side. There are even lawyers who work on a contingency basis: meaning they get paid after the case has been settled. Court proceedings should not be something to fear; being informed about the whole process through the help of a good lawyer is the best way to go through the case. Be informed and knowledgeable about court proceedings to avoid losing your case.